Re: Natural Gas as a Diplomatic Tool

March 9, 2014   ·   0 Comments


From: Alice Slater

To: Editor
New York Times

Does the Times really believe that America should be “heralding the rise of a new era of energy diplomacy” by beefing up our oil and gas sales to Europe and boasting about our huge potential to export carbon-laden filthy fuel to Russia’s fossil fuel customers as a way to curb Putin?  Is this a rational solution to the disturbing events in Ukraine?  Pour more carbon into the environment and watch the earth’s ecosystems collapse! Pick your poison—nuclear war or catastrophic climate change!! The follow up editorial to this tone deaf reporting,  “Natural Gas as a Diplomatic Tool,” is even more cynical, arguing for speeding up export applications and easing restrictions, knowing it would take years and costs billions of dollars. Advising that “American officials should use natural gas exports as one component of diplomacy” is like selling smallpox laden blankets to the indigenous people of America. It’s a death sentence for our planet and the billions should be spent instead on a Manhattan Project for solar, wind, geothermal and hydro energy which can power the whole planet by 2050 and undercut so many of the geopolitical resource-driven motives for war.

Alice Slater
New York, NY


Readers Comments (0)

Sorry, comments are closed on this post.

Read previous post:
Re: Ukraine Fights for Its Truth

From Eugene Schulman: Sir, Roger Cohen's op-ed piece in your newspaper might carry a little weight if it weren't filled...